win vs Make

Make automates workflows. win.sh runs your business — with AI that reasons, decides, and acts.

Context

What is Make?

Make (formerly Integromat) is a visual automation platform for connecting apps and routing data between them. Founders use it to build workflows like "when a new Stripe payment arrives, update this spreadsheet." It's powerful for rule-based automation.

The gap: Make executes rules, not decisions. It can't analyze whether your churn rate is alarming, decide to launch a re-engagement campaign, or write and publish the content itself. It moves data — it doesn't think about your business.

The fundamental difference

Make follows your rules. win.sh uses judgment — and acts on your behalf.

Make

  • Rule-based — no AI reasoning
  • Trigger-only — nothing happens proactively
  • No business context or memory
  • Complex scenarios become unmanageable
Judywin
  • AI that reasons about your business
  • Proactive — monitors metrics 24/7
  • Knows your goals and history
  • $59/mo flat, all included

Make vs win.sh: Feature comparison

Makewin.sh
AI decision-makingreasons about your business
Proactive monitoringheartbeat on Stripe & analytics
CEO architectureJudy delegates to specialists
Persistent business memorygoals, metrics, history
Native Stripe intelligenceData routing onlyunderstands revenue context
Content creationwrites and publishes autonomously
Budget control per agentcost shown before every action
Agent specializationmarketing, finance, ops agents
Pricing modelPer-operationFrom $59/moflat monthly plan
Business strategygoal-driven AI CEO
Best forApp-to-app routingRunning a business

Make pricing vs win.sh pricing

Make charges per operation — costs compound fast with heavy workflows. win.sh is $59/month flat with AI that does the reasoning for you.

Make

  • Per-operation pricing — scales with use
  • No AI reasoning — just rule execution
  • Complex scenarios are expensive to run
  • You still manage the logic manually

win.sh

  • From $59/mo — flat, predictable
  • AI CEO reasons about your business
  • Budget per agent with cost visibility
  • Agents improve without you updating rules

Limitations

Where Make falls short for founders

No real AI — just rule execution

Make runs the scenarios you define. It can't analyze your churn rate, decide what to do about it, or write a re-engagement email. It routes data; it doesn't reason.

Trigger-dependent — no initiative

If nothing triggers a scenario, Make does nothing. It won't notice a traffic drop overnight and start investigating. win.sh's CEO heartbeat monitors your business proactively.

No business intelligence

Make doesn't know whether a 20% revenue drop is a crisis or seasonal variation. It has no business context. win.sh understands your goals and history.

Complexity at scale

Dozens of scenarios with branching logic become impossible to manage, debug, and maintain. win.sh replaces scenario spaghetti with an AI that adapts automatically.

No memory between runs

Each Make execution is stateless. It can't remember last week's campaign performance when planning this week's. win.sh agents build compound context over time.

Costs compound at scale

Make's operation-based pricing gets expensive fast for high-frequency workflows. At scale, many founders spend more on Make than on a full AI business team.

Why win.sh

Why founders choose win.sh over Make

AI that reasons, not just routes

Make executes your rules. win.sh applies judgment — analyzing your metrics, spotting problems, writing content, and deciding what to do next. No scenario builder required.

Proactive, not reactive

Make only fires when something triggers it. win.sh monitors your business overnight and proactively surfaces opportunities and problems — before you think to ask.

Strategy, not just plumbing

Make connects apps. win.sh understands your business goals and works toward them — coordinating marketing, finance, and ops agents around what actually matters to your company.

Is this for you?

Who should switch from Make to win.sh?

Founders drowning in Make scenarios they can't maintain

If your automation setup has become too complex to debug or update, win.sh replaces the whole system with AI that adapts to your business without manual scenario management.

SaaS founders who want AI that understands their business

Make moves your Stripe data around. win.sh's CEO reads your revenue, understands the context, and decides what action to take — without you building a new scenario for every case.

Teams paying for multiple tools that Make connects

win.sh consolidates business monitoring, content creation, analytics, and decision-making into one AI team — potentially replacing your Make plan and several of the tools it connects.

Anyone who needs AI that adapts to their business

Make executes fixed rules. win.sh applies judgment. When your business changes, your AI CEO adapts — you don't have to rebuild your automation stack.

Frequently asked questions

Ready to replace rules with real AI intelligence?

Connect Stripe in 30 seconds. Your AI team starts reasoning about your business tonight.

Get Started Free

Free to start · No credit card · Cancel anytime